자동차운전면허취소처분취소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
1. The reasoning of the court of first instance concerning this case is that "Presidential Decree No. 13 and No. 11" of the second 13 and 8th 11 of the judgment of the court of first instance is respectively "Ordinance of the Ministry of Public Administration and Security," the second 15, 6th 12, 6th 15, and 7th 2 are "the principle of excessive prohibition" respectively, and the second 2th 3th 1 to 3th 16th 16th 3th 21 and 5th 3th 16th 3th 4th 7th 7th 10th 1st 10th 1st 10th 1st 3th 3th 3th 10th 1st 1st 2th 3th 3th 3th 10th 1st 1st 1st 1st 2th 1st 2th 3th 3th 1st 1st 2th 3th 1st 1st 2th 3th 1st 3th 3th 2th 2nd 14th 3th 2nd 20.
Article 93 (1) 11 requires a driver's license to "when a person who has obtained a driver's license commits any crime prescribed by Ordinance of the Ministry of Public Administration and Security, such as murder or rape, using a motor vehicle, etc."