beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.11.21 2017고정3503

폭행

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 23, 2017, the Defendant strongly urged the Victim F (F) to repay his/her obligations within E Scinaf in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E Scin on April 23, 2017, on the ground that: (a) the Victim F (F) strongly urged the Victim F (F) to repay his/her obligations; and (b) the Victim F (F) cinc in one time at the victim’s scinum,

At around 20:08 on the same day, the victim took a bath to the CCTV in the Kafa to secure evidence of the fact of assault damage at the above location, and assaulted the victim, such as her son, her son, her son, and her son, her son, her son, and her son, her son, and her son, her son, her son, and her son, who takes the head of the victim's knit

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. A CD attached to an investigation report (related to the confirmation of voice recording on a mobile phone covering the site of the case);

1. The Defendant’s photograph-facing photograph (around January 12, 2018, the Defendant asserted that it is inadmissible when filing a question about the possibility of editing the CD containing the situation at the time of assault. However, according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the victim recorded the above file from around 20:00 on the day of the instant case using a mobile phone, and up to 21:48 on the same day, up to 21:48 on the same day, up to the Internet site “Nber Cloud,” which is the storage space of the Internet site. After that, the victim again recorded the part at issue in this case among the above files and submitted it to an investigation agency. According to the result of the Defendant’s request for appraisal by the National Scientific Investigation Agency of the Republic of Korea on January 12, 2018, it can be acknowledged that the issue of editing the recorded file submitted by the victim cannot be confirmed. In light of the above recognized facts, the identity of the law can be recognized between the recorded file and the recorded file initially submitted by the investigation agency.

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act selection of punishment, and selection of fines;

1. Attraction of a workhouse;