However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 2012, 2012, the Defendant: (a) obtained a proposal from the Party B, “Sker,” “B,” a well-known “Sker in Japan,” to the Republic of Korea, to the effect that “Korea, who illegally stays in this country, may enter the Republic of Korea, will be 40,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

Any national who intends to enter the Republic of Korea in any area outside the Republic of Korea shall undergo an entry inspection conducted by an immigration control official at the entry port with a valid passport.

At around 23:00 on May 11, 2013, the Defendant: (a) was arrested by the police in Japan at the direction of the convenience store near the Port of the Simno-Sari, while the Defendant moved to a “H” to board the ship at the port of the Simno-Sa city in the Mano-Sa city in the Mano-Sa city in the Republic of Korea, five persons, including the above C, who wish to enter the Republic of Korea, who wish to enter the Republic of Korea; and (b) was arrested by the police.

Accordingly, in collusion with B, C, etc., the Defendant did not undergo an entry inspection by an immigration control official at the port of entry with a valid passport, and was prepared or conspired for the purpose of entry of C, etc. in Japan outside the Republic of Korea.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect against C, D, E, F, and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on accusation to immigration offenders;

1. Article 99(1), Article 95 subparag. 1, and Article 6(1) of the Immigration Control Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;