2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The gist of the claim is that the plaintiff was showing the symptoms of internal sewage that could not properly see the snow due to the snow bombing, and the plaintiff was visiting the Sungnam-gu Seoul and the third floor DNA department (hereinafter referred to as the "Defendant hospital") operated by the defendant and received medical treatment on October 23, 2015.

However, after the euthantic surgery, there have been symptoms that both snow were fluorous in both eyess, while snow continued, and the Plaintiff was in the Defendant Hospital to undergo re-operation within the two sides on April 25, 2016 and re-operation on May 2, 2016.

Nevertheless, the symptoms of the plaintiff's internal sewage do not disappear. As a result, the plaintiff suffered injuries, such as the sacrat, the sacratosis of both sides, the sacratosis of both sides, the sacratosis of sacrat, the detailed visual disorder, and the sacratitis.

The above injury of the plaintiff was caused by erroneous medical acts, such as causing damage to the plaintiff's angle while the defendant hospital conducted an euthantic surgery, causing excessive or inappropriate salvance of the skin body around the snow, etc. Therefore, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for damages caused by tort as the employer of the defendant hospital. The defendant is liable to pay the plaintiff 35,000,000 won (i.e., 10,000 won for lost income of 10,00,000 won for lost treatment expenses and future treatment expenses (= KRW 15,00,000 for lost income of 10,000 for lost treatment expenses) and damages for delay.

Facts of recognition

In order to correct symptoms of internal sewage, the Plaintiff was in front of the internal autopsy surgery at another hospital, but did not receive any visit to the Defendant hospital and did not notify it.

On October 23, 2015, the Plaintiff visited the Defendant Hospital to appeal for symptoms of internal sewage, and upon the recommendation of the medical staff of the Defendant Hospital, the Plaintiff was subject to internal autopsy.

On October 23, 2015, the Plaintiff written his/her written application for the surgery, and the written application for the surgery to the Plaintiff.