[2012 Highest 6275]

1. Even if the victim B seeks to borrow a promissory note, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to lend additional funds KRW 200 million to the victim after financing the funds by using the promissory note.

Nevertheless, on January 4, 2011, the Defendant made a false statement that he would not repay KRW 100 million before he/she lends 500 million or more of 100 million to the victim by means of telephone, and as a security for the golf course membership secured by the Defendant, he/she would receive a one copy of a promissory note from the victim, which belongs to the same day.

2. The criminal defendant shall have no intention or ability to repay even if he has received money from the victim for the purpose of notarial acts of promissory notes.

Nevertheless, on January 7, 2011, the Defendant notarized promissory notes sent to the victim by telephone, and there is no notarial cost. Accordingly, the Defendant sent only one million won. On the same day, the Defendant got transferred KRW 700,000 from the victim and acquired them by fraud.

[2013Kadan3129] On February 17, 2012, the Defendant, at the office of E located in the second floor of the Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Center, embezzled the money by refusing to demand the return of the victim on March 2012, 2012, even though he/she was unable to lend the money as security, upon receiving a request from G at the request of the victim F to prepare money by using the model of the model of the memorial hall issued by H, a foundation corporation, H, by using the model of the memorial hall.

[2013 Highest 3606]

1. From August 19, 2008 to 03:30 on the following day, the fact in the K entertainment tavern managed by the victim J of the victim I located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, does not have the intent or ability to pay the drinking value, and the fact is 6 soldiers and algos together with the daily behaviors, notwithstanding the absence of the intention or ability to pay the drinking value.