However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

From May 30, 2016 to June 7, 2016, the Defendant leased studio 206 and 205 respectively in Cheongdong-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, and Cheongdong-gu, D respectively, and placed an advertisement for arranging sexual traffic "F" on the Internet sexual traffic site "E" in each of the above places, and made a advertisement to have a female employee engage in sexual intercourse with G (Ga name: H), I (Ga name), and J (Ga name) by having a female employee engage in sexual intercourse with an unspecified number of customers who were found to receive KRW 150,000 or KRW 1.1.50,00,00,000 from customers and obtain profits from the remaining amount of KRW 20,000,000 from them.

Accordingly, the defendant committed commercial sex acts such as arranging sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officer in G;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Application of laws and regulations on internal investigation reports (e.g., history and site status), field photographs, and publicity photographs of “E” website

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging, etc. Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act for forfeiture, and Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Mediation of Commercial Sex Acts;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including the Mediation, etc. of Additional Collection, that the defendant has rented his studio and has engaged in commercial sex acts through the act of arranging commercial sex acts at the Internet site of commercial sex acts, and the criminal liability is not against the law.

In addition, the defendant has recently been sentenced to a fine of the same kind.

On the other hand, however, the period of crime is about 10 days, and there are many profits earned by the defendant.

It seems that the defendant is detained in two different ways in this case, and it seems that his mistake is seriously reflected.