However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 25, 2016, around 17:20 on July 25, 2016, at the medical care room for the victim E (the remaining, 51 years old) and the third floor of D Hospital's main hospital in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, the Defendant was unable to live because the victim got off to the Defendant on August 2004.

I think that the knife of the knife, which is a deadly weapon held in the house, has shown the knife of the knife of the knife, and the knife of the knife was lost by the knife

In the case of the victim's learning with sound, it shows the attitude that the victim seems to inflict harm on the body or life of the person, and the victim of about 30 minutes prevented the victim from leaving the place, thereby hindering the treatment work of the person.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A general list of seized articles, a protocol of seizure, and a list of seized articles;

1. 112 Notification to a department related to the report of the case;

1. Photographs of seized articles and application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to them at the time of crimes;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 284, 283 (1) (Special Intimidations, Selection of Imprisonment), and 314 (1) (Interference with business and Selection of Imprisonment) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (the fact that the defendant is the time of and seriously against the crime of this case, the fact that the defendant appears to have committed the crime of this case in a contingent state, the fact that there is no criminal record exceeding the fine since 1987, etc. are favorable to the defendant, in light of the contents of the crime of this case, the crime is not less complicated in light of the nature of the crime of this case, the fact that the defendant was unable to agree with the victim, and that there are many kinds of records that the defendant was punished for the crime of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence, the circumstances before and after the crime of this case, etc., and the conditions of sentencing and the crime of intimidation and interference with business under Article 51 of the Criminal Act as expressed in the trial process