존속살해
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six years.
A seized kitchen shall be confiscated by one square meter (No. 1).
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a school of Chinese nationality, and the victim D is a father of the defendant's father.
On January 2013, the Defendant entered Korea and lived together with the mother of the victim and the victim’s wife interest, and engaged in daily work.
In doing so, the victim has exercised violence against the defendant, the above E, etc. at the time of drinking flat, and the defendant and the defendant's mother from May 2016 to reside separately with the victim.
“A person who has resided separately from the Defendant is the victim’s clerical error in the indictment, and thus ex officio correction is made as the statement of “the person who has resided separately with the victim” is apparent.
On December 3, 2016, the defendant left China on December 3, 2016, and returned again with the mother E and the mother F of the defendant, dysnife with the victim's mother E and the mother of the defendant, and dysnife the victim by dividing them into the victim's drinking. The victim and the defendant's mother of the defendant were living together with the victim in the father-si G in the same day of the same day, where the defendant and the defendant live.
On December 3, 2016, at around 23:15, the Defendant displayed a detailed appraisal on the date on which the injured party boomed the accused and his/her family members, who drinked the victimized party with the injured party, and the injured party boomed himself/herself.
The defendant's face has been taken over by drinkingly.
When the defendant was assaulted against the victim, the defendant's father who prepared this house with money inside the inside the house in return for the victim's refusal to kill the victim.
The term "responding" and "responding down a bridge of the victim."
The phrase “a victim gets off the defendant’s bridge to cross the defendant’s bridge” is obvious that it is a clerical error in the victim’s bridge, and thus, it is corrected ex officio.
Since then, the victim sees the kitchen knife (17 cm in length, No. 1) in his kitchen in his kitchen.