폭행등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
Of the facts charged in the instant case, each of the assaults against C and D is prosecuted.
Punishment of the crime
[criminal history] On April 6, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment due to an injury, etc. by the Seoul Eastern District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence on July 14, 2017 in the Ansan Prison.
[2] Around November 8, 2017, the Defendant, “2017 Highest 3874,” listened to the phrase “OO friendship or” in Gwangjin-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City E, that a person under the influence of alcohol from an employee victim F cannot enter the said place, and made a large amount of talking, and interfered with the victim’s friendship or operation by force by gathering the arms from the victim five times as a drinking, and inserting the arms into the glass door in a free window, and inserting it into the glass door.
around 16:50 on November 20, 2017, the Defendant collected and damaged the property of the victim by gathering his/her living together with the victim, the market price of GB01 in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, where he/she had a horse or dispute with the victim at the home of the victim H.
around 04:00 on October 31, 2017, the Defendant, “2017 Highest 4193”, on the ground that the victim left her for a prolonged term with the victim D (59 years old) and her for a long term, and the victim left her for a long term, thereby damaging the market value of the property owned by the victim, which is the property owned by the victim.
The Defendant “M convenience store” in the operation of the Victim L (V, 52 years old) located in K in Gwangjin-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City between January 13, 2018 and 00:14 on the same day, the Defendant of “2018 Go-dan 152,” and the Defendant “M convenience store closed the door” of the Defendant.
“A small-scale bottled by a fire fighting unit for the reason that the fire fighting unit called “ was put on the floor and was in a studio.”
In order to avoid disturbance, such as throwing the POS equipment and the products displayed on the floor, the market price in which it was located, and the display stand for the fruit, which was stored on the floor, damaged the repair cost.
In this respect, the Defendant is as above.