All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

2. The judgment is based on the following: (a) the fact that the defendant had a significant number of records of punishment for the same kind of crime; (b) the fact that the defendant was able to gather breathy and was knife with a knife to the control official, and that the crime was committed twice for three months; (c) the fact that the defendant committed the crime is an unfavorable reason for sentencing; (d) when the defendant was in operation of his occupation and occupation for living, he committed each of the crimes of this case; (e) the control official who was threatened and threatened by the defendant wanted to have a preference against the defendant; and (e) the fact that the control official who was threatened and threatened by the defendant wanted to have a preference against the defendant;

In light of the above sentencing factors, in full view of the Defendant’s age, family relations, academic background, career, and all other matters regarding the sentencing specified in the instant records and arguments, the sentence of the lower judgment is deemed appropriate, and thus, the assertion of the Defendant and the Prosecutor is without merit.

3. In conclusion, since the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.