However, if the sale of buildings in units has not been completed later, D inevitably received the above apartment as payment for the construction cost, and the construction cost and the price for goods to the plaintiffs and the defendant were paid in lieu of the above F apartment G in the name of the defendant and the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of the defendant.

At the time, the Defendant sold the above G units and paid the construction cost to the Plaintiffs later.

At present, although the above G market price exceeds the total amount of claims between the plaintiffs and the defendant, the defendant merely makes payment to the plaintiffs by oral means, but the payment is delayed on the next day.

Therefore, the plaintiffs seek the payment of the principal contract price claim and the settlement money equivalent to the appraised amount of the joint maintenance due to the liquidation of the partnership.

In the case of a juristic act attached to an associate officer, it shall be deemed as a condition when it is reasonable to deem that the additional officer does not perform his/her obligation unless the facts indicated in the subordinate officer have occurred, and where it is reasonable to deem that the additional officer should perform his/her obligation even if not only the indicated facts have occurred but also the objection has become definite, it shall be deemed as determining the time limit when the existence of

Therefore, if certain facts are attached to the repayment of the obligation already borne, it shall be deferred unless there is a special reason.