손해배상(기)
1.(a)
Defendant E shall pay Plaintiff A KRW 4,00,000, KRW 2,000,00 for each of the above amounts to Plaintiff B, C, and D, and each of the above amounts. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 24880, Dec. 2, 2013>
The summary of the case is ① The Plaintiffs seek compensation for consolation money on the grounds that they suffered emotional distress due to the Defendants’ tort, which caused damage to the honor of the Plaintiffs, which is their family members, in relation to “the fraud marriage between Defendant E and G”, and ② the Plaintiff A seeks compensation against Defendant E for property damage equivalent to the borrowed money’s tort.
In fact, on September 16, 2004, Defendant E and G completed the marriage report with H on September 16, 2004, and the first (J) was generated between them, and completed the divorce report between H on August 19, 2005.
Since then, G added up the amount of 2 years and 5 months by introducing a branch in May 2008, G brought up a marriage ceremony on January 29, 201, and completed the marriage report on August 19, 201.
G and the Plaintiff A, B, and sibling C and D, who are their parents, did not notify the Defendant E of their marriage and childbirth history until the day when the amount of the family members premised on marriage is a meeting and a marriage ceremony, as well as the above teaching system.
Defendant E was aware of the fact that he married with his husband and gave birth to K on March 10, 2012, and he was aware of the fact that the other male and female committed an unlawful act. On November 1, 2013, Defendant E removed the G’s marriage relation certificate, etc. through this, Defendant E became aware of the fact that G married with H and that there was a child between the fact that G was divorced and that there was a child.
Accordingly, Defendant E filed a lawsuit seeking divorce and consolation money against G on November 5, 2013 (Seoul Family Court 2013Dhap10482). On July 9, 2014, Defendant E declared that he/she expressed his/her intention to marry due to G’s deception, and the judgment that the marriage is revoked pursuant to Article 816 subparag. 3 of the Civil Act was finalized on August 5, 2014.
Defendant E, including Defendant E’s diskettes demonstration, is in front of the Gangnam-gu Seoul L Apartment, where Plaintiff A and B reside around November 30, 2013 and December 1, 2013, around 07:00.