When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On May 27, 2015, the Defendant driven a B B B B B B's car and led to the driving of the front road in front of the Gosan-dong Gosan-dong Gosan-dong Gosan-do from the original bank to the central bank.

Since the traffic signal, etc. is an intersection in operation, the driver has a duty of care to safely conduct the traffic signal according to the new code.

Nevertheless, as a result of neglecting this, the part of the left side of the victim C's DK5 car running to an intersection by negligence in violation of the signal signal, was shocked with the front part of the vehicle driving by the defendant.

As a result, the defendant suffered from occupational negligence the injury to the above victim, such as salt dynasty, which requires two weeks of treatment, and the approval E of the damaged vehicle suffered from the injury such as brain synasty requiring two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3(1) and proviso of Article 3(2)1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, the selection of a fine [the confessions and reflects by the defendant, the vehicle of the defendant is covered by the comprehensive motor vehicle insurance, and the victim C expressed his/her intention not to be punished by the defendant at an investigative agency (C as the wife of the above traffic accident and E, the victim of the above traffic accident, expressed his/her strong intention to punish the defendant, while the present situation of C is not good

(3) The defendant's first offender, etc.

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.