The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, it is justifiable for the lower court to have convicted all of the charges of this case.

In addition, there is no violation of the law of logic and experience and the principle of free evaluation of evidence, or there is no error of law by misunderstanding the legal principles on deception and fraud in fraud.

In addition, according to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not less than ten years

In this case where a more minor sentence is imposed on the defendant, the argument that the punishment is too unreasonable is not a legitimate ground for appeal.

Therefore, by the assent of all participating Justices, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.