2. Considering the fact that the Defendant recognized all of the instant crimes and reflects on the fact that the Defendant was in a situation where emotionally difficult while leaving Vietnam and working in Korea to support his family, the Defendant suffered injury, such as getting the head of the above victim due to the mere reason that the Victim G, who is a workplace company, made the instant crime in the process of business instruction, and attempted to murder several knife solely on the ground that the victim E, who was first viewed at the main point, was unbrupted, was indicted as a crime of violating the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (collective, deadly weapons, etc.), and the Defendant committed a attempted murder while not attending a trial even though he was indicted as a crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (collective, deadly weapons, etc.), and the victim did not completely recover from damage to the victims, etc., considering the circumstances unfavorable to the Defendant, and the overall sentencing conditions under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, and the enactment of the sentencing guidelines and sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court, etc., the sentencing of the lower court does not seem to have any discretion.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.