2. Defendant B and C are above.

Defendant

A is a person who operates the “Fanma treatment establishment” on the 7th floor of the building in Changwon-si, and Defendant C is a person who had worked as an employee in each of the above massage treatment establishments from February 14, 2014, and Defendant B from February 22, 2014.

Defendant

A, from August 2012 to March 22:00, from March 10, 2014, around 1110 to around 22:10, operating a performance hall equipped with facilities such as the above place, 14 rooms in a size of about 110 square meters, carcers, and waiting rooms for sexual traffic women. On February 14, 2014, Defendant C employed Defendant B as each employee, and 80,000 won out of the money received from customers to be paid to sexual traffic women, 23,00 won as compensation for the rest of the place.

Defendant

C and B, from the above date of employment to March 22:00, from the above date of employment to the date of March 10, 2014, by arranging sexual traffic and receiving approximately KRW 170,000 from the unspecified male customers who want sexual traffic (1.80,000,000,000,000,000,000,000) from each room, and received approximately KRW 130-1,50,000 per month.

Accordingly, Defendant A conspiredd with Defendant C to: (a) from August 2012 to February 13, 2014, to February 21, 2014; and (b) from February 14, 2014 to February 21, 2014, Defendant C and B arranged commercial sex acts in collusion with Defendant C and B for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each statement of G and H;

1. Photographs at the time of crackdown;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to an investigation report ( concerning calculation of the amount of additional collection);

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. and Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of punishment;

A. Defendant A: Imprisonment option

B. Defendant B and C: Determination of each fine (i.e., reflectability, minor degree of the Defendants’ commission of the crime, Defendant B’s previous conviction, and Defendant C’s previous conviction)

1. Defendant B, C, and Defendant B: Articles 70 and 69 of the Criminal Act.