명의변경 청구의 소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. On the Plaintiff’s assertion, the Plaintiff asserts that the registration title of the instant vehicle ought to be transferred to the Defendant, since C and C, a de facto marital relationship, and a lawsuit claiming the division of property (so-called “C” and “C” (so-called the “instant vehicle”), which had no income as C’s child, are pending, and the Defendant without any income as C’s child, registered a vehicle listed in the separate sheet in collusion with C in the name of the Defendant (hereinafter “instant vehicle”), thereby making it impossible for the Defendant to be subject to division of property.
Plaintiff
As asserted, it is not sufficient to recognize the existence of the instant automobile acquired by C with the funds of C solely on the basis of each statement of Gap and Eul evidence No. 2 and No. 4, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.
Rather, according to the evidence evidence Nos. 1 through 7, the fact that the Defendant entered into a sales contract for the instant automobile in total of KRW 36,995,810 and paid KRW 14,895,810 out of the purchase price, and only the fact that the Defendant paid KRW 22,10,000 in total of KRW 36 months is recognized.
Therefore, the Plaintiff’s assertion from a different premise is without merit to examine the remainder of the issue.
2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.