When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. The C Management Group (hereinafter referred to as the “C Management Group”) and D Management Group affiliated with B organizations (hereinafter referred to as the “D Management Group”) were in conflict with each other at the construction site of the E construction site of the ethic City of ethic City, while they conflict with each other as equipment input problems.

Around 14:56 March 11, 2016, the Defendant, who is a member of the Victim F, committed assault against the Defendant, committed assault against the Victim F, the Defendant: (a) was knife, fele, fele, fele, fele, fele, fele, fele, fele, fele, and fele, fele, fele, fele, fele, fele, fele, fele, fume, fume, fume, fume, fume.,

B. During the time and place of the above paragraph (a) above, the injured Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim H on the victim, who was in a fluoral dispute with the victim H (ma and 45 years of age), the victim was pushed the Defendant, against the victim, thereby pushing the victim on the Defendant’s chest, and by taking a fluoral action, fluoring the victim’s hand, etc. that was fluent, and fluoring the victim’s hand, etc. that was fluent with the victim’s flu

2. On March 11, 2016, the Defendant committed a crime of damage to public documents and committed a voluntary act with the charge of a police station of the Sungyang-gu, Namyang-gu, Namyang-do, Namyang-do, in relation to the assault and injury cases, such as paragraph (1).

The Defendant, at the above police station criminal and the strong 3 team office, signed and submitted his/her signature on the voluntary consent form, provided that he/she again presented the voluntary consent form, and that he/she was arrested in the act of committing a crime, and there was no consent to the voluntary consent form, and thereby, damaged the effectiveness of the voluntary consent form in the name of the Defendant, which is a public document, by means of tearing the tear of the consent form, and inserting it into the Australian machine, thereby impairing the effectiveness of the voluntary consent form in the name of the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1.In the fifth trial record, each of the witness F, witness H and witness I.