beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2016.07.01 2016고정139

협박등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2016 High Court Decision 139]

1. The Defendant, on the ground that he did not contact the Defendant, who was the victim B (n, 47 years of age) who had maintained an internal relationship before the towing, could not be informed that the Defendant was the victim and the victim was the internal relationship with the Defendant on August 28, 2015, around 18:00, around September 9, 2015, around 19:00, around October 26, 2015, and around 10:00 on October 26, 2015, and around 3:00 on October 26, 2015.

“In the end, the victim threatened the victim.”

2. A defendant who violated the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc.: on April 8, 2014, using a mobile phone from the victim of an insane area in Daegu or smaller than Daegu on April 8, 2014;

B. I do not refuse to die of a mixed person, if we do not brutly do so in Pyeongan-ro.

From October 27, 2015 to October 16:14, 2015, “in addition to sending text messages,” the text leading to fear and apprehensions repeatedly reached the victim 16 times in total, as indicated in the attached crime sight table.

[2016 high time 321] No person shall allow anyone to repeatedly reach another person with words, etc. causing fears or apprehensions through an information and communications network.

Nevertheless, on December 11, 2015, the Defendant is a mobile phone of the victim on the ground that the victim B (V) who had previously been in an internal relationship with the victim on December 11, 2015, was no longer in an internal relationship with him/her, and that he/she was not in an internal relationship with him/her.

From December 17, 2015 to December 21:32, 2015, including sending the word “i.e.,” the text that arouses fear or apprehensions throughout 34 times in total, such as the list of crimes in the annexed list.

Summary of Evidence

[2016 High Court Decision 139]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to B;

1. An investigation report (attached to the output of data from which intimidation and letters are sent by Defendant’s phone) (2016 Go fixed 321).