beta
(영문) 서울행정법원 2015.11.27 2014구단12980

재요양및추가상병불승인처분취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On December 1, 2006, the Plaintiff driven a shuttle bus at a specialized driving school of East Asia, while serving as a driver, and completed medical care on April 30, 2012 after obtaining medical care approval from the Defendant (hereinafter “the instant injury”) on the ground that the Plaintiff was suffering from “the brain-related emergency escape symptoms and the post-pactine tyropical tyrosis, brain-related (non-influoral), alvine, salvine (non-influoral), fluoral dysium, non-defluoral base salt, and cerebral damage (hereinafter “the instant injury”).

B. On May 14, 2014, the Plaintiff asserted that the Defendant had taken drugs due to the mental disorder caused by the instant accident and applied for additional medical care and additional medical care.

C. On August 8, 2014, the Defendant issued a non-approval disposition against the Plaintiff on the ground that “In order to recognize the application for additional medical care and additional injury and injury to the instant additional injury and disease, the causal relationship between the disaster and the instant additional injury and the instant additional injury and disease is medically recognized, but after a considerable period from the date of the accident, the result of the instant additional injury and disease was discovered during night time, and the Plaintiff’s age is naturally and naturally likely to cause the instant additional injury and disease, as well as there is a medical opinion that there is no medical basis to acknowledge that the instant additional injury and disease have occurred due to mental and medicinal use.”

(hereinafter “Disposition in this case”). / [Grounds for recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the instant additional injury was caused by taking drugs as a mental disorder caused by the instant accident, and even if so, the psychological cause of the instant additional injury is the occurrence of the instant additional injury.