Defendant C’s KRW 2,500,000 to Plaintiff A, and KRW 500,00 to Plaintiff B, and each of the said money from July 8, 2017.

A. The plaintiff A is a female juvenile who was born in 2001, who retired from a middle school with the recognition function or ability to cope with situations lower than that of the future average.

Defendant D was a student of Plaintiff A.

Plaintiff

B is the father of the plaintiff A, and the defendant E is the parent of the defendant D.

B. At around 11:30 on February 21, 2016, Defendant D sent and received letters related to C and sexual traffic through smartphone hosting display in the Gwangju Mine-gu, Gwangju Mine-gu, and recommended Defendant C and the Plaintiff to arrange for sexual traffic.

(Plaintiffs asserted that Defendant D and H forced sexual traffic, but there is no evidence to acknowledge this).

Defendant C paid the Plaintiff A and 1.30,000 won at the O2 O2 O2, located in Gwangju Mine-gu, 12:00,000 won, and agreed to engage in sexual intercourse, and only the Plaintiff’s chest was delivered.

Around February 29, 2016, Defendant D, along with H, abused the Plaintiff A’s face at the OMoel O heading room located in the Mapo CityJ on February 29, 2016, on the ground that the Plaintiff made a false statement, such as the Plaintiff A’s her blick face at a time, and the number of times twice the face via drinking, and led the Plaintiff A to multiple scamblings that require approximately two weeks of treatment.

[Ground of Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1 to 9 evidence, Eul 1 to 1 (including partial numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings (defendant D and Eul 1)

2. Determination

A. According to the facts of the above recognition of the claim against the defendant C, the plaintiff A was aged 15 years old at the time of this case and it is difficult for the plaintiff A to exercise the right to sexual self-determination with a genuine meaning, and sex offense against the child may distort the concept of sexuality of an unestablished child and thereby have a significant adverse effect on the mental and physical development of the child, but the defendant C knowingly purchased sex with the plaintiff A being a minor, which constitutes a tort that infringes on the right to sexual self-determination by interfering with the free decision-making of the plaintiff A.

In addition, the plaintiffs' status is the defendant C.