폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등재물손괴등)등
All appeals filed by prosecutors and defendants are dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal argues that the court below sentenced the defendant to a social service for two years and one hundred and sixty hours of probation for the six months of imprisonment, and that the defendant asserts that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable because the sentence of the court below is too too unreasonable, and that the prosecutor argues that the sentence of the court below is too un
2. We examine both the judgment and the Defendant’s assertion of unreasonable sentencing.
Considering the fact that the defendant's prior purchase of the camping net is damaged by leashing, television, glass, etc. and obstructed the hospital business, and that the risk of recidivism is likely to be very rough, it is necessary to issue a warning to the defendant in light of the fact that the defendant's risk of recidivism is very rough and high, in light of a large number of violent power.
However, it is reasonable to maintain the sentence of the court below in light of the following circumstances: (a) the defendant has a profoundly against his mistake from the investigative agency; (b) the victim has agreed with the defendant in full time; and (c) the female friendly group is planning to marry by reconciliation with the defendant; and (d) the defendant is currently engaged in traffic accident management affairs related to the accident insurance company; (b) although the defendant is currently engaged in the traffic accident management affairs, community service for 160 hours not only conforms to sanctions corresponding to the crime of this case but also needs to be taken into account in order to prevent recidivism; and (d) other circumstances, which are the conditions for sentencing of this case, such as the defendant's age
3. As such, the appeal on the ground of unfair sentencing by the prosecutor and the defendant is dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.