The punishment of the court below against the accused (ten months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination takes into account the following factors: (a) the Defendant’s mistake is divided; (b) the Defendant’s health is not good; and (c) the Defendant’s judgment and equity should be taken into account when the Defendant rendered a judgment at night and in the event of larceny subject to punishment in 2012; (b) the Defendant appears to have continuously driven the instant cargo under the influence of a license; (c) the Defendant had continuously driven the instant cargo without any mandatory insurance; (d) the Defendant had committed a traffic accident causing human and material damage; and (e) the Defendant escaped without any relief measures, etc.; and (e) there is no circumstance in which the Defendant made efforts to recover the damage of the victims of the traffic accident; (c) the Defendant did not recover the damage of the victims of the traffic accident; and (d) the Defendant’s age, character, environment, circumstances leading to the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc. were taken into account; and (e) the sentence imposed by the lower court cannot

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.