beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.09.12 2016고단2131

절도

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around 02:50 on June 22, 2016, the Defendant: (a) discovered the victim D who was parked in the driver’s seat before Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City (Seoul Special Metropolitan City Gwangjin-gu); (b) stolen things; (c) opened an unregistered car door; and (d) taken the cash of KRW 100,000 on the part of the victim at the bank located in the front of the steering seat; and (b) removed the cash of KRW 100,00 on the part of the victim.

L. A. L. theft was committed.

On June 24, 2017, the Defendant discovered that he/she was seated in the Indian chrons of the Victim G (53 tax) in front of the F'F' in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City at around 04:20 on June 24, 2017, and that he/she was divingd, and that he/she was seated with his/her clothes, knife card, identification card, etc.

As a result, the theft was committed.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

"2016 Highest 2131"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Cash photographed "2017 Height 2195";

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. G statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes for reporting internal investigation (specific and tracking of offenders);

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. According to the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38(1)2 and 50 of the same Act, there are multiple records of criminal punishment on the grounds of the same offense committed against the defendant for the reasons of sentencing, the defendant repeats the larceny without a certain residence, the amount of damage is somewhat minor, and some of the damaged items were returned to the victim, etc., the punishment as indicated in the order shall be determined in consideration of the sentencing conditions shown in the public trial of this case.