A. is a person who has recently retired.

Defendant

B around 18:36 on June 19, 2014, the Defendant has a dispute over the victims A (the age of 38) and the arrangement of documents who found in the company at the (State) D office located in the North-gu, Gwangju, North-gu, Gwangju, and the said company.

B. During the process of closing the door and preventing the victim from closing, the defendant neglected his/her duty of care to prevent the victim from sticking to the door, and caused the victim to have the part of the victim's hand on the door by negligence, thereby causing the victim to suffer injury, such as the part of the left part which requires a treatment for about two weeks.

B. While Defendant A neglected his duty of care to prevent the victim from leaving his door in the process of making the victim B (the age of 55) and fluorging at the above temporary location, Defendant A caused the victim to suffer injury, such as the left slick slick, which requires the victim’s treatment for about two weeks, by negligence.

2. The facts charged of the instant case are crimes falling under Article 266(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s explicit intent under Article 266(2) of the same Act.

On October 14, 2014, Defendants may recognize the fact that they have withdrawn their wish to punish one another in this court. Thus, all of the instant public prosecutions are dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.