However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On February 27, 2018, the Defendant embezzled five of the Defendant’s five of the five of the first five of the first five of the first five of the first five bicycles, including, but not limited to, the owner’s non-authorization color, the first of the first, the first, the first, the first, the first, the first, the first, the first, the first, the first, the first, the first, the first, the first, the first, the first, the first, the first, the first, the first, the white HOD bicycle in a white color, and the first, the white HOD, on the Defendant’s C truck, without taking necessary measures, such as loading the victims, and returning it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of this Act and subordinate statutes to seizure records, internal investigation reports, CCTV images extracted;

1. Relevant Article 360 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 360 (1) of the Criminal Act selection of punishment, and selection of fines;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act suspended execution (see, e.g., Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e., Supreme Court Decision 2006Da1448, Apr. 1, 201)

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;