2. The judgment of the court below is recognized that the defendant made a confession of all of the crimes of this case while being divided, and that part of the victims have returned to the victim, but the defendant has already been sentenced to a punishment for the same kind of crime and completed the execution thereof within the repeated crime period. Each of the crimes of this case is about 12 times for a period of 4 months, and the damage amount is very significant. The court below's punishment is the only punishment which has been sentenced to discretionary mitigation at the lowest statutory penalty, and all of the various sentencing conditions in the records and arguments such as the circumstances of the crime of this case, means, circumstances after the crime of this case, etc. are considered to be unfair.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit and it is so decided as per Disposition under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.