beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.06.13 2018나66470

손해배상(기)

Text

The plaintiff's appeal and the claim extended in the trial are dismissed, respectively.

The plaintiff's litigation costs after the appeal are filed.

Reasons

1. The basic facts of the claim (1) around June 2016, the Plaintiff: (a) from the non-party C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “non-party C”), the date of the initial registration of the Dinti Vehicle owned by the said company; and (b) 4,430,00 the ex-factory vehicle price of the Dinti Vehicle

(zc) The Plaintiff’s vehicle is the Plaintiff’s vehicle;

) A lease agreement between Eul and 60 months (from June 2016 to June 2021), monthly rent of KRW 742,810, and deposit of KRW 8.530,00 (hereinafter “instant agreement”).

A) Around that time, the Plaintiff’s vehicle was delivered. The Defendant is the insured vehicle E (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

(2) around 00:22 August 2, 2016, the Defendant vehicle is the insurer which has entered into an automobile insurance contract with respect to the Corporation. (3) The Defendant vehicle is located near Seo-dong, Seo-dong, Seo-dong, Seo-dong. (4) The Defendant vehicle is not aware of the established location.

3) The Plaintiff’s vehicle parked at a later stage was shocked (hereinafter “instant accident”).

At the time, the cumulative odometer of the Plaintiff was 2,550km.

(i) the Plaintiff’s vehicle due to the instant accident is the left-hand liar liarer, which is also called the quota panel, as follows:

(3) There were KRW 4,229,335 on the repair cost of the Plaintiff’s vehicle due to the instant accident (the Defendant appears to have paid the repair cost directly to the maintenance business entity with the compensatory damages insurance (the Defendant appears to have paid the repair cost directly to the repair business entity).

(4) After the completion of the repair of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, the Plaintiff or the Nonparty Company individually requested Nonparty F to assess the amount of loss caused by the exchange value of the Plaintiff’s vehicle (hereinafter “the amount of loss caused by the decline”), and written assessment as of September 1, 2016, only the part on which the Plaintiff’s vehicle was accepted is “the part on the left side” in the main part of the repair part of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, but only the part on which the repair of the Plaintiff’s vehicle was accepted, compared to the accident.