대여금
1. The Defendants shall jointly and severally pay to the Plaintiff KRW 110,000,000 and the interest rate thereon from January 27, 2006 to the date of full payment.
In light of the purport of the entire pleadings and arguments, Gap evidence No. 1 (the Defendants’ name of the Promissory Notes and the aforesaid Promissory Notes) did not conflict with the Defendants’ seals, and thus, the authenticity of the above Promissory Notes is presumed to have been established. The Defendants asserted that the above Promissory Notes were forged. However, there is not sufficient evidence to acknowledge the above assertion merely with the statement No. 1, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it). Gap evidence No. 2, No. 3-1 and No. 2, the Plaintiff loaned the Defendants at 10 million won interest rate of 10 million won on January 26, 2006. The Defendants jointly issued a promissory Notes with interest rate of KRW 110 million per annum (10 million per annum), and the Defendants were jointly and severally liable to pay the Plaintiff 100 million interest rate of KRW 10,000 (10 billion per annum) and KRW 206,000,000 per annum 106,000 per annum.
Therefore, since the plaintiff's claim against the defendants of this case is well-grounded, it is decided as per Disposition by admitting all of the claims.