2. 50,000 won where the defendant does not pay the above fine.

1. At around 00:30 on December 7, 2011, the injured Defendant: (a) was under the influence of the Defendant, who was under the influence of the Defendant, and without being aware of the victim, on the ground that “I am under the influence of liquor to the Defendant; (b) I am under the influence of the Defendant; and (c) I am under the influence of the Defendant; and (d) I am under the influence of the Defendant, “I am under the influence of the Defendant; and (d) I am under the influence of the Defendant, I am under the influence of the Defendant; and (d) I am under the influence of the Defendant, “I am under the influence of the Defendant; and (d) I am under the influence of the Defendant, I am under the influence of the Defendant; and (d) I am under the influence of the Defendant.” (d) I am under the influence of the Defendant, there are several empty boms on the wall, where I am under the opening.”

2. From around 00:00 on July 6, 2012 to around 03:00, the Defendant obstructed the Defendant’s bar business for approximately 30 minutes of the Victim’s 30 minutes of the work, such as: (a) the Defendant refused the Victim’s son at the above C points; and (b) on the ground that “I am the next opportunity, I am the Victim’s son”, and (c) the Defendant was frighted to “I am the fright and fright of other fright and fright,” and (d) the Defendant considered the son’s son business on the floor of the Victim’

3. On August 11, 2012, the Defendant causing property damage: (a) at the parking lot following the Cju store around 23:00, the Defendant demanded several times to reach an agreement on the facts constituting the crime set forth in the above 1 and 2; (b) however, on the ground that the female does not have reached an agreement and does not hear his/her horse, the Defendant damaged the property that requires repair worth KRW 989,780 of the repair cost by sealing the front engine cover of the D car parked in the place on hand on the ground that he/she does not hear his/her horse.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of B and E;

1. Investigation report (the attachment of a site photograph interfering with the business);

1. Commissioning for appraisal (No. 102);

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damaged vehicles and estimates for vehicle damage;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury), Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstruction of business) of the choice of punishment for the crime, the Criminal Act;