A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for four months.

However, from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive, each one year.

The Defendants were foreigners of the nationality of business beer kistan, and were in charge of computer dismantling and other work in E, a victim, an incorporated association, who engages in the business of collecting electronic equipment, such as computers, and distributing such equipment to the welfare center.

1. On May 4, 2017, Defendant A committed the crime committed by Defendant A: (a) at the victim’s location located in Ma-si F of the wife population, the Defendant, while engaged in computer dismantling work, placed two computer CPU units of the market price of KRW 100,000 in a brush and stolen them; (b) from that time until July 24, 2017, the Defendant stolen the computers owned by the victim on a total of ten occasions, as shown in Appendix 1.

2. On June 19, 2017, from around 14:00 to around 14:00 of the same month, the Defendant committed the crime of Defendant B: (a) committed the crime with two plug North Korea in which the market price in the Nowon-gu warehouse at the place is unknown; and (b) stolen the computer parts and the Nowon-gu, which were owned by the victim three times in total from June 2, 2017 to July 14, 2017, respectively, as shown in the attached Table 2.

3. The Defendants conspired with each other to commit the joint crime, and during the period from June 30, 2017 to July 19:00, 2017, the Defendants: (a) committed the crime against the Defendants, at the above location of the victimized party’s warehouse in the Nopt North Korea; and (b) committed the theft of the Defendants’ joint crime against the Defendant, Defendant A, at the above location of the victimized party’s damage.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement in each police statement with respect to G and H;

1. Each entry in each protocol of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of each of the Acts and subordinate statutes stated in the transaction statement and copy of passbook A by the suspect;

1. Relevant legal provisions and defendant A who choose a sentence against a crime: Each of the Criminal Code Article 329 (the larceny under Paragraph 1 of the judgment below), Articles 329 and 30 (the larceny under Paragraph 3 of the judgment below) of the Criminal Code, and Article 329 (the larceny under Paragraph 2 of the judgment below) of the Criminal Code, and Article 329 (the larceny under Paragraph 2 of the judgment below) of the Criminal Code.