2. The Defendant again committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime due to the same crime, and the lower court does not seem to be unreasonable, taking into account the following circumstances: (a) comprehensively taking account of the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, family environment, the background and consequence of the crime, etc., and all of the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant records and pleadings, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, family environment, and the background and consequence of the crime committed by the Defendant by discretionary mitigation of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving).

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.