When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On February 4, 2017, around 19:55, the Defendant: (a) around 105, 703, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, the domicile of the Defendant: (b) around 105, 105, and 703, and (c) as the noise problem between the victim D ( South, 33 years old) residing in the upper floor and the floor noise problem; (b) as the Defendant might have had a dispute against the victim with a steel spacker located in the new site where the victim was placed, the Defendant displayed the victim's face and had a part of the victim's face on several occasions, and carried out approximately four weeks

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant (the second public trial date);

1. The self-examination protocol (D);

1. On-site photographs;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Recording record (The fact that the defendant has recorded the victim, as the defendant would bring the victim to a bar spath, shall be proved by the suspect interrogation protocol (D) and recording book);

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime.

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Consideration of the grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, including the background of the instant crime, the method and degree of injury, and the Defendant’s agreement with the victim that the victim was not punished, and the Defendant was found to have been in a noise problem between floors, and several expenses incurred in the process, and the criminal records of the Defendant’s criminal punishment (except for a fine imposed for traffic crimes on two occasions), etc.