폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
Although the Defendant appealed on the ground that the Defendant was too unreasonable due to the Defendant’s punishment (two years of imprisonment) of the lower court, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the same kind of violent crime, in particular, the Defendant committed each of the instant crimes without being aware of the fact that the Defendant was committed during the period of repeated crime, such as the crime of injury and damage to property, etc., even though he was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for each of the instant crimes; the blood alcohol concentration measured at the time of driving the instant drinking was significantly higher than 0.197%; and the Defendant was unable to receive a letter from the victims other than the Defendant who was a mother, even if considering the Defendant’s health condition and family relationship, it is not recognized that the sentence imposed on the Defendant for the reasons indicated in the reasoning of the lower judgment is too unfair.
Since the appeal by the defendant is groundless, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.
However, pursuant to Article 25 (1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, the "Road Traffic Act" of the 6th page of the judgment of the court below shall be corrected as "the former Road Traffic Act (amended by Act No. 17371 of June 9, 2020)".