beta
(영문) 창원지방법원진주지원 2016.05.12 2015가단3200

공유물분할청구 등

Text

1. 피고 B, C은 원고에게 사천시 D 전 405㎡ 가운데 별지2 (특수)지적현황측량 성과도 표시 ㈄...

Reasons

Basic Facts

On April 12, 2012, the Plaintiff purchased KRW 30,000,00 by specifying the 100 square meters in attached Form 1 as part of the 30,000 square meters among the 8,031 square meters (hereinafter “instant K forest”) owned by Samdo Development Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Tdo Development”). On April 17, 2012, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer as to shares 331/8031 square meters for convenience on April 17, 2012.

The Samdo Development developed the instant K forest as the main site, etc. and divided the said forest into five parcels on January 8, 2013 and February 25, 2013, respectively, as indicated below.

As above, the following persons, including the original and the Defendant, share the following “owner” column in the proportion of shares in the same column with respect to each divided lot (if different from this paragraph, to specify only the lot number and land category as in the instant L Parking lot).

The Plaintiff is a parcel number, owner of land 1 L. 3,338 square meters, 2 M. 82 square meters, Plaintiff 4983/16062, F. 20914773/391495188, G Village Association 895/95188, 33789/39148/3914918/39148/39149, 33789148/39149149/3918, 4322, 498/1602, 20973/398/4942, 394/4842, 394/485/197/198, 3394/485/198 of the Plaintiff’s land number, land category owner-owner-owner-owner-owner-owner-owner-owner-owner-owner, etc.

), ㈄ 부분(이 사건 D 전의 일부이다

) Although the Plaintiff, the Defendants, the J, and H did not comply with the request for the division of 100 square meters, the Defendants did not agree on the division of the instant D, they did not reach an agreement as to the method of division. [Grounds for recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap’s evidence Nos. 1 through 5, and Eul’s evidence No. 1 (including a serial number, and the purport of the entire pleadings).