A. The sentencing of the Defendants (the three-year imprisonment, the one-year imprisonment, the one-year imprisonment, the one-year imprisonment, the two-year suspended execution, the two-year social service hours) on the Defendants is too unreasonable.

B. The lower court’s sentencing against Defendant A and B is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. Examining the various sentencing conditions in the instant case, the fire-fighting crime of this case was committed by Defendant A, the president of the G branch of the FF Trade Union, and Defendant B, the president of the G branch of the FF trade union, who is the head of the G branch of the FF trade union, was willing to prevent the fire of vehicles owned by union members and non-members, in an effort to enhance the participation rate of the FF trade union and maximize the effects of the strike by preventing the normal operation of other cargo during the strike period, and the fire-fighting of the members and non-members should be prepared by putting the fire that made by mixing the width and the paint with 5:5 ticks in order to avoid water death, and the act of extinguishing the fire of the members of the GF branch from 01:00 to 17:00,000 won by putting the fire-fighting vehicle of the members of the GF branch in front and 20,000 won by means of extinguishing the fire-fighting vehicle of the members of the GF branch.