When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

No person shall borrow or lend any access medium while demanding, demanding or promising the consideration in using or managing the access medium.

Nevertheless, on March 16, 2018, the Defendant is a trade company of D, and it is necessary to account as a matter of tax reduction or exemption. The Defendant is a trade company of D, and it is necessary to account as a matter of tax reduction or exemption.

It shall be used for 3 days on the face of lending the account, and it shall be paid 3 million won as the user fee per opening.

“On receipt of the proposal to the effect that “”, in response, the head of Cze Card 1 connected to the Kwikseter’s bank account (F) and the head of Cze Card 1 linked to the Kwikseter’s bank account (G) of the Defendant, sent the password to his name in each Kwikseter’s service article, while informing the KKaka Stockholm of the password.

Accordingly, the Defendant promised to pay the price, and lent the approaching media.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Copy of the police statement made to E;

1. Each statement of H and I;

1. Each investigation report (including statements, etc. of victims, response to details of financial account transactions, suspect E and telephone calls, attaching documents for public perusal by suspected persons E, and submitting a detailed statement of account transactions of suspects);

1. Reporting of internal investigation (Submission of a certificate of confirmation of deposit of a victim);

1. Certificates of deposit transactions (E);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of account transfer details;

1. Article 49 (4) 2 and Article 6 (3) 2 of the Act on Electronic Financial Transactions concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The act of lending an electronic financial transaction access medium on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is not only impairing the trust in electronic financial transactions, but also harming multiple victims by using the leased access medium for criminal acts such as telecommunications financing fraud.