2. Although the defendants recognized each of the crimes of this case, they are against the principle that they joined the crime of this case, the victims who subscribed to the crime of this case with the intention to make high profits in a short period of time, and are responsible for the occurrence of crimes or the expansion of damage, the actual amount of damage is less than the amount of damage indicated in the annexed crime list as stated in the judgment of the court below, the defendants Eul agreed with some victims in the court below, and the defendants do not want the punishment of the defendants by mutual agreement with some victims. However, each of the crimes of this case is deemed to have committed each of the crimes of this case, even though the defendants solicited the victims by receiving the subscription fee from the victims in the form of money in the name of the subscription fee, and soliciting them to raise the risk of an unspecified number of victims by paying them an allowance, and there is no record that the defendants A had been punished two times for the same kind of crimes, in particular, even though they were under the suspension of execution period due to the same kind of crimes, and the defendant B still committed the crimes of this case without considering the motive and the defendant's age of the same kind and circumstances.

3. In conclusion, the Defendants’ appeals are all filed.