2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

However, as a result of the confirmation by the Defendant’s acceptance of the Port of this case, it was impossible to use the efficacy small amount that was the initial purchase purpose due to the defect for the purpose of containing it, and as a result, the Defendant resisted to the Defendant that it was a defect during transport, and thus, the Defendant cannot be held liable for it. However, in fact, it was very old and worn out that the resistance of this case

Therefore, the Defendant and the designated parties are jointly and severally obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the sum of KRW 3 million for the Port of this case and KRW 180,000,000 for the transportation cost incurred by the Plaintiff.

2. It is not enough to acknowledge that there was a defect as alleged by the Plaintiff in the instant aviation, even before the transport of the instant aviation by the Defendant to the Plaintiff was made, solely on the written and image of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 12 submitted by the Plaintiff (including the number of branch numbers), and there is no other evidence to acknowledge otherwise.

(B) The plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is justified, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench, although the above appeal of this case was damaged during the transportation process. However, the evidence submitted by the plaintiff alone is insufficient to recognize the fact that the defendant is responsible for the transportation of the above appeal of this case.