beta
(영문) 대전지방법원서산지원 2020.06.24 2019가단55571

소유권이전등기

Text

1. The Defendants shall enter the Defendants’ share in the attached Table 2 concerning V 221 square meters prior to Seosan-si in the attached Table 1 list.

Reasons

1. Claim against Defendant N

A. The following facts can be acknowledged in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in each statement of evidence Nos. 1 to 22 and evidence No. 1 to acknowledge the facts.

1) K on June 22, 1965, the land indicated in Paragraph 1 of the Disposition (hereinafter “instant land”).

B) After completing the registration of ownership transfer in its own future, on February 19, 196, K sold the property to W. On April 14, 1991, K transferred the property to Q, children, Q, J, L, M, N, andO, the inheritor’s spouse, Q, children, Q, L, M, N, N, and Q has succeeded to the property. Moreover, Q died on February 23, 2018 and succeeded to the property of Q, his child, and the Defendant S, and U, his child, died on April 28, 2018 and succeeded to the property of W. The Defendants’ inheritance shares were the same as the attached list 2.2) after purchasing the land of this case from K, and died on March 8, 200 and succeeded to the property of the Plaintiff, A, C, D, E, E, I, the inheritor’s spouse.

And W W Y died on December 6, 1997, and the plaintiff B, his heir, succeeded to it on behalf of the deceased.

In addition, after W’s death on August 21, 2009, the Plaintiff G and Plaintiff H, who is his heir, succeeded to the property.

The plaintiffs' shares in inheritance are as shown in the attached list 1.

B. According to the above facts of recognition, the Plaintiffs, W and their inheritors, occupy the intent of possession for a period of 20 years from February 19, 1996 to the peace and public performance, and the prescription for the acquisition of possession was completed on February 19, 2016. Therefore, the Defendants, the heir of K, are obliged to implement the registration procedure for the transfer of ownership due to the completion of the prescription for the acquisition of possession on February 19, 2016, with respect to the Defendants’ share in attached Table 2, as stated in attached Table 1, based on the Plaintiffs’ share in attached Table 1.

C. Conclusion, the plaintiffs' claim against Defendant N is justified and acceptable.

2. Claim against the remaining Defendants

(a)as described in paragraph 1 of the indication of the claim;

(b) Defendant N, S, and ., on the ground of recognition;