However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On November 1, 2013, at least 23:50 on November 23, 2013, the Defendant was found at the D main points operated by the victim C, who is a d main points of the divorceed in Busan YY-gu, Busan, and obstructed the victim’s main points operation by finding out a fine of 3 million won for the case of assaulting the victim. The purport is to solve this problem, and the victim’s “culp, flaps,” and brucing the victim, thereby obstructing the victim’s main points operation.

2. On November 2, 2013, the Defendant obstruction of performance of official duties: (a) 00:10 on November 2, 2013, the Defendant received a report from the above main station and received a notice to the police officer to listen to the details of the report and to leave the suspect; and (b) notified the police officer to leave the scene of the report; (c) the police officer: (a) the police officer: (a) the flick; (b) the flick; (c) the flick; (d) the flick; (f) the flick’s shoulder; (f) the flick, flick; and (f) the flick G’s shoulder, flick; and (f) obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of official duties in relation to the handling of reports on the 112 Incident case.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police statement law to C, G, and H

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution (including the fact that the victim C is the wife of the defendant, and the fact that the victim is white and is against the defendant);

1. Probation under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;