beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.11.15 2017고단2986

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

On April 20, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to three years of imprisonment with prison labor due to a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) at the Suwon method Board, and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 8, 2017.

1. The business structure Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd. is a company established for the purpose of general living household and door-to-door sales of cosmetics, and when concluding a contract with a general buyer through the salesperson (Health Pln) who was admitted as a sponsor, the head of the business office entrusted by the company with the affairs concerning the registration of sales contract by the salesperson shall register the sales contract, and the head of the business office entrusted with the affairs concerning the registration of sales contract by the salesperson shall manage the business office;

Upon success in the five or more contracts each month, the sales team shall be supported by one million won as the team leader if the contract amount is at least 40,000 won, and if the contract amount is at least KRW 100,000,000, it shall be eligible for the head of the business occupation. If the sales team has entered into a contract with at least 50,000 won per month, the head of the business occupation shall also be granted the settlement subsidy of KRW 1,00,00 per month, and if the sales team has entered into a contract with at least 50,000 won per month, allowances shall be paid from KRW 40,000 to KRW

2. From around August 2011, the Defendant was in de facto in excess of his/her obligation, and was dismissed in the business place due to the fact that he/she received money under the name of investment from others and used it for the repayment of the Defendant’s existing obligation. On October 2012, the Defendant was dismissed in the business place. However, even though the Defendant did not have the ability to pay for the rent of the product between one year and one year, he/she was willing to receive the Defendant’s allowances and sales allowances by concluding a product contract on behalf of the Defendant under the conditions that the Defendant would pay for the rent of the product on behalf of the Defendant.

A. The Defendant paid C Allowances to Co., Ltd. with low business performance.