beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.11.15 2016가합531176

손해배상(의)

Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 20,560,054 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from January 21, 2012 to November 15, 2017.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On January 16, 2012, the Plaintiff applied the Defendant’s “B-type Foreign Legal Consultant” to the “B-type Foreign Legal Consultant,” which was operated by the Defendant, and at the time, the Plaintiff was in a serious state of both sides’s internal sewage due to the gymmetric sewage on the right side.

B. The Plaintiff is a disease with the upper eye, the upper eye, and the function of the prevention thereof, which are loaded in the upper eye, and the upper eye of which has fallen in a tent or in a post-astronomical manner, and where the upper eye has fallen easily.

The internal sewage generally evaluates the level of the function of the internal sewage, and confirms the degree of the state of eyeburging, and determines the operating method.

The method of operation of the internal sewage is very large to reduce the boomment of the internal sewage (the reduction of the booming or the reduction of the booming body) and to transfer the booming body.

On January 21, 2012, the Defendant received an operation to correct the internal sewage from the Defendant (hereinafter “instant operation”).

다. 이 사건 수술 이후 원고는 우측 눈에 토안증 토안(兎眼)이란 눈을 완전히 감을 수 없거나 애를 써야만 눈을 감을 수 있는 것을 말한다.

It is possible to correct the internal sewage due to the cause of the soil erosion, not to remove the internal sewage, or to remove it from being attached to the internal shock, or to reduce the reflectors, the skin, the bottoms of the skin, and the snow galle, caused by the balparing operation.

The occurrence of this, and the occurrence of each single-fashion, each colony, and the internal-fashing evidence, etc., was occurred;

[Ground of recognition] In the absence of dispute, Gap evidence 2, Eul evidence 3, Eul evidence 2 and Eul evidence 3, Eul evidence 2 and 5 (including the number number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the result of the court's commission of physical examination on the hospital of Korea University Medical Center, the result of the court's entrustment of medical examination on the medical records for the Tolllls, Seoul Women's Hospital of Seoul, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Summary of the plaintiff's assertion

A. The defendant who violated the duty to explain shall be based on the general snow type prior to the instant multiple alcohol.