손해배상(기)
1. The Defendant’s KRW 6,085,150 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from January 6, 2017 to May 14, 2019.
1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the pleadings in each of the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including each number, if any) as to the liability for damages, the defendant, around January 6, 2017, committed an injury to the right shoulder, such as a balle broom broom, by putting the plaintiff’s balle, balle, and balle, by having the defendant go beyond the stairs in front of the restaurant located in Jung-si, the government-si around January 22:20, 2017.
Therefore, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for damages suffered by the plaintiff due to the above tort.
2. Scope of liability for damages
(a) Posking treatment expenses and other damages (i.e., 836,850 won (i., 724,850 won) / [based on recognition] evidence Nos. 3 through 6 (including each number, if any, if any), and the purport of the whole pleadings;
B. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 4 (including each number, if any) of passive damage Gap, the Plaintiff received an injury diagnosis from the Defendant’s unlawful act that requires the external surgery, management of status, and rehabilitation exercise for about six weeks, and the Plaintiff received hospitalization for four days from January 7, 2017 to January 10, 2017.
Accordingly, the rate of loss of labor capacity for six weeks, which the plaintiff should receive rehabilitation treatment for normal life after the date of tort, is recognized as 100%, and the daily average number of days of operation for urban daily workers is recognized as 102,628 won and 22 days.
Therefore, the plaintiff's lost income for 42 days from January 6, 2017 to February 16, 2017 is calculated as KRW 2,248,30 (= KRW 102,628 x 0.958 x 42 days, and less than KRW 100).
Although the Plaintiff alleged that it sustained a considerable amount of loss from the lost income until March 5, 2017, the Plaintiff’s statement of each of the above evidence alone is alone.