beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.08.10 2019고정2022

저작권법위반

Text

Each of the instant public prosecution against the Defendants is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that Defendant B is a corporation operating the manufacture and sale business of building materials, and Defendant A is the representative director of the above Defendant B. A.

Defendant

A From February 19, 2019 to July 8, 2019, the Defendant infringed on the copyright of the program copyright holder by illegally reproducing three E and one F, a computer program-based corporation, at the Defendant’s office located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and using it for business purposes.

B. Defendant B, at the date and place specified in paragraph (1), Defendant B, the representative director of the Defendant, committed the above violation in relation to the Defendant’s business.

2. Determination

(a) Applicable provisions of Acts: Article 136 (1) 1 (Defendant A) and Article 141 of the Copyright Act;

(b) Offenses subject to prosecution: Article 140 of the Copyright Act.

C. On August 10, 2020, after the prosecution of this case, a letter of revocation of complaint was submitted to the Defendants.

(d) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act;