However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 23:52 on March 3, 2020, the Defendant: (a) expressed the desire to pay the taxi fee on the front side of the Seongdong-gu Sungdong B apartment, Changwon-gu, Changwon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, to the police officer D in charge of the police box belonging to the Changwon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City Police Station, who was called after being reported 112, and to pay the fare from E by the police officer; and (b) assaulted the police officer, such as “I am going to the police line, so I am to the police line, I am to the police line, I am to drink.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of the above police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D and E;

1. Application of CCTV-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that it reflects the fact that the punishment of a fine is imposed and that there is only a previous offense);

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;