beta
(영문) 제주지방법원 2016.09.20 2015고정430

경범죄처벌법위반등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around February 14, 2015, the Defendant, “2015 Highly 430, the Defendant,” while under the influence of alcohol, continued to take a bath to E in the process of performing duties while under the influence of alcohol, was discharged from her mother and child used in performing a bath to F, etc., and f was sleeped by very rough and visual words and conducts, while under the influence of alcohol.

“The Defendant, from May 7, 2015 to May 21:00, 2015, 2015, 201: (a) the Defendant found the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol in the Jeju Police Station D police box from around 20:40 to around 21:00 on the same day, and without any reason, found the Defendant, “the same bit of bitch bitch bitch bitch” and “the bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitp,”

개 새 꺄", '야 이 씨 발 놈 아, 교도소에 쳐 넣어 라" 라는 등 약 20분 가량 욕설을 하며 술을 마신 채 관공서에서 소란을 피웠다.

On June 18, 2010, the defendant of "2015 Highly 703" was a person who has served on the Jeju District Court a fine of three million won in the Jeju District Court due to the violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) on June 18, 2010, and on February 24, 2012, a person who violated the Road Traffic Act (driving) on February 24, 2012, has served as a fine of three million won

1. On May 2, 2015, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol 09:09 on May 2, 2015, the Defendant driven a 49 cc or less of ownership without registration at the 35-meter section of the 35-meter section, from a mar restaurant located in the Yan-Eup, Yan-dong, Jeju to the parking lot for the D police box located in C, while driving the 0.074% of alcohol during blood.

2. Violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation for Damages (Non- mandatory insurance) Defendant is a de facto holder of the 49cc., non-registered 49cc. in the above paragraph (1).

No holder of Oral Ba shall operate Oral Ba which is not covered by mandatory insurance on the road.

Nevertheless, even though the defendant knew that he did not subscribe to the mandatory insurance, he was driving the 49cc occ occ in the section of approximately 35 meters, such as the above paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

[2015 High Court Decision 430]

1. Written opinion;