beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.04.09 2019나71099

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The defendant cited the judgment of the court of first instance, even if the defendant's responsibility is partially recognized, is the relationship that the defendant started with the trust of D, and D has been divorced from D.

In light of the circumstances, including the fact that the plaintiff and D had been in a separate or old state, and that the plaintiff had already been in a so-called party relationship, the court of first instance asserts that the consolation money recognized by the court of first instance is excessive. However, even if all evidence, including the evidence additionally submitted in the court of first instance, are reviewed again by comprehensively taking into account all the evidence, the defendant still maintains a living relationship with D, and the defendant's wrongful act has influenced or has affected the marital relationship with D, it seems that the amount of consolation money recognized by the court of first instance is appropriate.

Therefore, this court's reasoning is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, thereby citing it as it is in accordance with the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The decision of the first instance court is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.