2. The Plaintiff:

A. The defendant corporation.

A. The plaintiff is a party. 1) The plaintiff is Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Main Complex Building A (hereinafter "the main complex building of this case").

(2) In order to manage the 1,363 households of the 4-dong 1,363 unit, Defendant Malis Korea is a business entity that constructed and sold the instant main complex building. Defendant Malis Korea is a construction company that contracted the construction of the instant main complex building from Defendant Malis Korea to execute the construction of the instant main complex building. Defendant Malis Korea is a guarantee company that entered into a warranty contract for the instant main complex building as seen below.

B. A contract for warranty liability and usage inspection 1) In the event that Defendant AS Construction and Defendant AS Construction Mutual Aid Association fail to perform the obligation to repair defects incurred in the instant main complex building, the Defendant AS Construction Mutual Aid Association shall enter into a contract with the guarantee creditor (the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Mayor) to pay the warranty bond within the period and amount specified in [Attachment 1] below (hereinafter “instant warranty contract”).

(1) On December 23, 2005, the guaranty creditor of the instant multi-unit building was changed from December 23, 2005 to December 22, 2006 to December 22, 2006 to December 461, 207, 199; 461,078; 1993 December 23, 2005 to December 22, 2007 to December 22, 2007 to December 23, 2005 to December 23, 2005 to December 691, 200 to December 22, 2008; 205, from December 23, 2005 to December 23, 2005 to the instant multi-unit building’s warranty contract.

C. In constructing the instant main complex building, Defendant 1’s claim for the occurrence of defects and repair thereof does not perform the construction of the parts to be constructed in accordance with the design drawings or differs from the design drawings.