The defendant from around 2016 to August 2017, and from June 2018, the same year.

8. B(n, 36 years of age) and deceased by the first police officer.

Around August 4, 2018, the Defendant: (a) received a letter from the victim that 3 million won had been lent to the victim on or around August 4, 2018; (b) received a letter from the victim that the victim would repay the debt within 3 months; (c) on or around November 8, 201, the Defendant contacted the victim several times to receive the debt on the basis of the said letter, but no answer was made from the victim; (d) on November 9, 2016, the Defendant returned to the victim’

1. At around 00:10 on November 10, 2018, the injured Defendant demanded that the victim returned home prior to Ulsan-gu C’s located in Ulsan-gu, U.S., to repay the above debt, but was refused from the victim. As such, the victim’s face was humping back to the victim’s face on a hand due to the finger floor and drinking, and the victim’s face going beyond the floor, and thereby, the victim suffered injury, such as the throke, which requires approximately four weeks of medical treatment.

2. The Defendant causing property damage found that the victim injured the victim at the time and place set forth in the above paragraph (1) above, while discovering that the victim injured the victim, and caused the damage to the victim by reducing the above mobile phone owned by the victim, which is equivalent to KRW 1,557,600 in the market price, from the time and place to the point of view, and destroying the amount of the mobile phone by spreading the above mobile phone owned by the victim, which is equivalent to KRW 1,557,60 in the market price.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. B written statements;

1. A report on investigation;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. A written confirmation of subscription to a mobile phone;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each photograph (Evidence Nos. 6, 12, 15);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 257 (1) and 366 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment against the crime, Articles 257 (1) and 366 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes refers to the defendant himself/herself and himself/herself.